Verify a Neuralisse bottle, and what to ask for

None was supplied to this desk, and no batch record or third-party test result was supplied either. The lot and certificate strings printed on this site are draft reference strings this desk composed so that a buyer has something concrete to ask the order desk for. Neither is a laboratory document and neither came from the seller.

Read the lot code and the best-before from the base of the bottle, photograph the base, then call +1 (302) 200-3480 or write to [email protected] quoting that code and asking for the batch Certificate of Analysis with a per-ingredient assay. The seven-step request on this page is written to be copied.

Not published. No third-party test result, no laboratory name, no accreditation and no sampling protocol appears in any document supplied with this product. Operation Supplement Safety, run by the US Department of Defense, is blunt about why that matters: “the only way to know what is in any particular dietary supplement product is through laboratory testing.”

The lot number is on the base of your own bottle and is different for every batch, so no website can tell you yours. The string N-26/MY-3415 that appears on this site is a draft reference string this desk composed as something concrete to quote in a request. It is not printed on any bottle and it is not a batch identifier.

The label puts the lot and the best-before on the base of the bottle. On the flat artwork supplied to this desk the date is not legible, so no expiry can be quoted here. Check the base of the bottle you receive and photograph it on arrival, along with the safety seal under the cap.

A per-ingredient assay would. A total-weight assay would not, and that distinction is the whole point of this page. Weighing the blend confirms it comes to 575 mg and says nothing about the split. The split is already derivable from the label — about 567.5 mg of magnesium glycinate, leaving about 7.5 mg for the other five together — and only a per-ingredient result can confirm or refute it.

No amount is printed and none can be measured from the label. Alpha lipoic acid is second of six inside a remainder of about 7.5 mg, so it is capped at about 7.5 mg — a ceiling, not an amount. Only a per-ingredient laboratory result would convert that ceiling into a figure, and no such result was supplied.

No facility statement of any kind is printed on the label. A Good Manufacturing Practice seal was supplied as separate artwork and it does not appear on the bottle; it names no certifying body and carries no registration number. The label names a distributor in Aurora, Colorado, and no manufacturer. The three supplied marks are set out on the seals page.

At minimum: the product and batch identity, the date of manufacture and the date of test, the laboratory and its accreditation, who selected the sample, the assay method, a measured result for each declared ingredient with its specification and tolerance, and the contaminant panels — heavy metals, microbials. The blank list further up this page sets out all of those fields against what was supplied, which is nothing.

It depends on three things you can check by reading it: whether the lot on the certificate matches the lot on your bottle, whether the laboratory is named and accredited, and whether the sample was selected by the laboratory rather than supplied by the company. A document that fails any of those three is evidence about a sample rather than about your bottle, and should be read as such.

Correct, and permitted. Operation Supplement Safety records that “the specific amount of each individual ingredient in a proprietary blend does not have to be listed”. What is unusual on this label is that the blend can still be solved: the declared 80 mg of magnesium at a correct 19% of the Daily Value fixes the first ingredient at about 567.5 mg of 575 mg, and everything below that is a ceiling, not an amount.