Disclaimer
Disclaimer: information about a label, not advice about you
This is the most important page on this site and the one most likely to be skipped. Everything here is information about a label. None of it is advice about your body, and this is a product bought by people with symptoms.
This site reads a dietary supplement label and publishes what is printed on it, what follows arithmetically from it and what is missing from it. It is not medical advice. It is not a recommendation to buy and not a recommendation to avoid. It is not a diagnosis, not a treatment plan, and not a substitute for a conversation with a clinician who knows your history, your prescriptions and your conditions. Neuralisse is a dietary supplement rather than a drug and is not approved by the FDA before sale. The editorial score published here — 2.4 out of 5 — grades how much this product publishes about itself, not its safety, its efficacy or its quality. And one thing on this page is more useful than the rest of it: nerve symptoms that have not been explained by a clinician are a reason to see one.
The FDA statement, and what it actually means
“These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.”
Printed in full on the Neuralisse label, and in the footer of every page of this site
That sentence is printed on the bottle and reproduced at the foot of every page here, and it is more informative than its familiarity suggests. Readers routinely take it to mean either much more or much less than it says, so it is worth unpacking in three parts.
First: the FDA does not approve dietary supplements before they are sold. That is not an oversight and not a loophole. It is how the category works, and the FDA says so in its own words:
“Under DSHEA, FDA does not have the authority to approve dietary supplements before they are marketed.”
U.S. Food and Drug Administration — Questions and Answers on Dietary Supplements
Second: the manufacturer is responsible for its own claims. Nobody vetted the words on the front of this bottle before it went on sale. Responsibility for a supplement’s claims, and for the safety of what is in it, sits with the company that makes and markets it. That is precisely why a site like this one reads the panel instead of the marketing: the panel is the part with rules attached.
Third: the disclaimer is a legal requirement, not a confession. Its presence on this label does not mean a problem was found, that anything was investigated or that a complaint was made. Every supplement making a structure/function claim must carry it, and a label without it would be the thing worth noticing. This one prints it in full.
Why the wording is what it is
“Structure/function claims may describe the role of a nutrient or dietary ingredient intended to affect the normal structure or function of the human body … the disclaimer must state that the product is not intended to “diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease,” because only a drug can legally make such a claim.”
U.S. Food and Drug Administration — Structure/Function Claims
Read the second half of that quotation carefully, because it explains the whole framing. A supplement may describe the role of a nutrient or dietary ingredient in affecting the normal structure or function of the body — nerve support, comfort support, nutritional support, which are the three asterisked claims on this bottle. It may not say the product diagnoses, treats, cures or prevents a disease, “because only a drug can legally make such a claim”.
So the disclaimer is not a hedge bolted onto a medical claim. It is the price of making a non-medical one. The label of this product stays inside that framing and this desk credits it plainly: three asterisked structure/function icons, the disclaimer printed in full, and no disease word anywhere on the bottle.
Where the product does not stay inside it, and what that means for you
The flat label artwork reads NERVE SUPPORT FORMULA. The Inside Neuralisse marketing graphic renders the same bottle as NEUROPATHY SUPPORT FORMULA, twice. Neuropathy is a named medical condition and no supplement may claim to treat one. Both are printed on this site and the label is treated as the product. The consequence for a reader is specific: nothing has been assessed, by anybody, as a treatment for neuropathy, and if that word is why you are here, the appointment matters more than the bottle. The full account of that one word is published separately.
The label’s own caution, verbatim
Before anything this desk has to say, here is what the manufacturer printed on the bottle. It is transcribed exactly, word for word, with nothing tidied, reordered or expanded.
“Do not exceed recommended dose. Not for use for those under the age of 18 or pregnant or nursing mothers. Consult with a physician prior to use especially if you are taking a medication or have a medical condition.”
The caution block, transcribed from the Neuralisse information panel
This block is a credit and is recorded as one
This warning block is complete and well drafted. It names the dose limit, the age restriction, pregnancy and nursing, medication and medical conditions. Several products in this series manage less. Read it as four separate instructions rather than as one paragraph: a dose limit, an age limit, an exclusion for pregnancy and nursing, and a direction to consult a physician if you take a medication or have a medical condition. The last of those is the sentence that applies to most of the people who will read this page.
Everything else the label says about safety is set out below, in the words it uses, together with what it does not say. The right-hand column of the last row is the part a reader has to supply from elsewhere, and the clinician who prescribes for you is the person to supply it with.
| Detail | What we were actually given |
|---|---|
| Suggested use | As a dietary supplement, take one (1) capsule daily. |
| Caution | Do not exceed recommended dose. Not for use for those under the age of 18 or pregnant or nursing mothers. Consult with a physician prior to use especially if you are taking a medication or have a medical condition. |
| Storage | Store this product in a cool dry place below 30 degrees C (86 degrees F). |
| Children | Keep out of reach of children. |
| Safety seal | Do not use if safety seal is damaged or missing. |
| The FDA statement | These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. |
| Distributed by | Neuralisse, Aurora, CO 80011, USA, with a telephone number and an email address printed beside it. |
| What the label does not say | No GMP statement. No manufacturer. No country of origin. No amount for five of the six blend ingredients. No mention of warfarin, insulin or any named medicine. No guarantee. No price. |
Two of those omissions are worth connecting to the ingredients. The word warfarin appears nowhere on this product, and NCCIH records that coenzyme Q10 may interact with it and with insulin. The number 350 mg appears nowhere either, and that is the upper limit the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements sets for supplemental magnesium. Neither omission is a breach of anything; both are reasons the label’s own instruction to consult a physician is the operative sentence on the bottle.
What this site does and does not do
The clearest way to state the limits of this site is as two lists. The left-hand column is the whole of what this desk claims to do. The right-hand column is longer, and it is the one that matters on a page like this.
What this site does
- Transcribes the label — the panel, the Other Ingredients line, the caution block, the storage line and the place of business — exactly as printed.
- Shows its arithmetic. Every derived figure is published with the sum that produced it, so a reader can disagree with a step rather than with a conclusion.
- Quotes two federal bodies and no others, by name, with the document named and linked, in their own words.
- Records what is missing, and leaves it recorded as “not published” rather than softening it into “unclear”.
- Credits the label where it earns it. This one earns more than most: correct Daily Value arithmetic, the best ingredient naming in the series, a complete caution block and a real place of business.
What this site does not do
- Give medical advice. Not on this page, not on any page, not in reply to an email.
- Diagnose anything. Nothing here can tell you what is causing a symptom, and nothing here should be read as an attempt to.
- Recommend buying or avoiding this product. The findings are published; the decision is not made here.
- Test anything. No bottle was opened, weighed or assayed. No Certificate of Analysis, batch record or third-party test was supplied.
- Publish a price or a guarantee length. Neither appears in any document supplied, so neither appears here.
- Publish a rating, a review count or a testimonial as evidence. Ten reviews were supplied; all ten are published as a finding rather than as endorsement, because every sentence in them was also supplied for an unrelated product.
- Claim a medical reviewer. The reviewer slot on every page is a vacant bracket, deliberately.
- Speak for the seller. This desk takes no orders, sees no payments and cannot change a delivery, a refund or a price.
One sentence from the right-hand column deserves repeating on its own. No bottle was tested. Everything on this site is a reading of documents, and Operation Supplement Safety puts the limit of that exercise better than this desk could: the only way to know what is in any particular dietary supplement product is “through laboratory testing”.
The score grades documentation, not safety
This site publishes an editorial assessment of 2.4 out of 5 for this product. It is the single most misreadable thing here, so what it measures is stated before the number is used anywhere.
It grades how much this product publishes about itself and how well the published material holds together. Six criteria: label completeness, ingredient naming, formula transparency, claim accuracy, price transparency and seller transparency. Nothing else is in it.
Read the rows and the shape is unmistakable. The two documentation criteria this label is good at — label completeness and ingredient naming — score four out of five each, and they are the best marks any product in this series has received. The three it is poor at are about figures that were withheld: one printed amount across six ingredients, no price for anything, and a contact set that does not agree with itself.
What the score is not
It is not a safety rating. It says nothing about whether this product is safe for you, and a reader who treats a low number as a warning about harm has read it backwards. It is not an efficacy rating: nothing here tests whether anything works. It is not a quality rating: no bottle was assayed and no certificate was supplied. A well-documented product can be useless and a poorly documented one can be perfectly fine. The score measures the paperwork, and the paperwork is the only thing this desk was given.
The same caution runs the other way, and this product is the clearest case of it in the series. The four-out-of-five for ingredient naming is a real credit for a real thing: two binomials with plant parts and a standardisation at 95% curcuminoids. It is not a statement that those ingredients will do anything, and it is not weakened by the fact that five of the six are present inside a 7.5 mg remainder. A precise name for a trace amount is a precise name and it is still a trace amount.
A ceiling is a ceiling and not an amount
Almost every per-ingredient number on this site was produced by this desk rather than printed on the bottle, and the distinction between the two kinds of figure is the most consequential thing on this page after the clinician section.
Only one ingredient quantity is printed on this label: 80 mg of elemental magnesium, declared above the blend at 19% of the Daily Value. The blend itself is declared as one total of 575 mg covering six ingredients, and no individual amount inside it appears anywhere.
The figures this site gives for the other five ingredients — 7.5, 3.7, 2.5, 1.9 and 1.5 mg — are ceilings. They follow from the FDA’s requirement that blend ingredients be listed in descending order of weight, applied to the remainder left after the magnesium chelate is accounted for. Each one is an upper limit: the true quantity is at or below it, possibly far below, and nothing on the label narrows it further.
The one figure that is not a ceiling is the magnesium glycinate at about 567.5 mg, and it is not a measurement either. Nobody weighed anything. It is arithmetic from the 80 mg printed on the panel and the published molar mass of magnesium bisglycinate — 172.42 g/mol, of which magnesium is 24.305, so 14.1% by weight; 80 ÷ 0.141 is about 567.5. The six steps, and a sensitivity table for the single assumption they rest on, are published in full.
Why the qualifier is not pedantry
A derived figure quoted without its qualifier stops being a derivation and becomes a content claim. “At most 2.5 mg of L-carnitine” is a bound produced by arithmetic from a printed total. “2.5 mg of L-carnitine” is a statement about what is in the capsule, which nobody on this side of a laboratory is in a position to make. This site writes the qualifier every single time, and asks anyone quoting it to keep it.
What the citations do and do not cover
Every quotation on this site comes from one of nine documents, each of which was opened and read, and each of which is linked in the references at the foot of every page. Four of them are NIH Office of Dietary Supplements or NCCIH fact sheets; the rest are FDA pages and one from Operation Supplement Safety, run by the US Department of Defense.
What a citation establishes is narrow and it is worth being exact about. It establishes that a named body published those words about that ingredient. It does not establish that the ingredient works, that it works at the amount on this label, or that the body which published it has any view of this product. None of the nine sources mentions Neuralisse, and none of them was written about it.
Two consequences follow, and they cut in opposite directions. The first: where a fact sheet describes a dose, this site sets the label’s ceiling against it and publishes the comparison. The clearest case is L-carnitine, where the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements records trials at “0.25 to 4 g/day” — 250 to 4,000 mg — against a ceiling here of about 2.5 mg. The same fact sheet also records that healthy children and adults “do not need to consume carnitine from food or supplements”, which is published here because it is part of the same paragraph.
The second: where no fact sheet exists, nothing is published. Alpha lipoic acid and butcher’s broom return nothing at NCCIH’s Herbs at a Glance index and nothing at the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, so this site gives no dose and no effect for either and will not borrow one from a journal. That rule costs those two ingredients the benefit of the doubt, deliberately, because choosing which papers to quote is the step that turns an information page into a sales page.
Absence of a fact sheet is not a finding about an ingredient
It is a finding about available federal information. No federal fact sheet is not evidence of harm and not evidence of benefit. If either body publishes one, it will be read and quoted here. Until then the page says not published, which is less satisfying than a verdict and is the only thing this desk is in a position to say.
Who should speak to a clinician first
The label’s own instruction is to consult a physician before use if you take a medication or have a medical condition. This section adds the specifics a label does not carry, and the first of them is the reason this page exists.
Anyone whose nerve symptoms have not been explained
This is the one to read twice, and it is not a warning about this product. Numbness, tingling, burning, pins and needles or weakness that nobody has explained to you is a reason to see a clinician. Those symptoms have many causes. Some are straightforward, some are reversible if they are addressed and some are not, and the difference between them is not something a Supplement Facts panel can tell you.
The specific risk a page like this one has a duty to name is substitution: buying a supplement instead of getting an explanation. A bottle is easier to obtain than an appointment and it feels like action. It is not an investigation, and nothing on this label claims to be one — the product’s own front panel says nerve support formula and nothing more. If the word neuropathy is what brought you here, that word came from a marketing graphic rather than from the bottle, and it describes a condition a clinician diagnoses.
Anyone taking warfarin or insulin
NCCIH records that coenzyme Q10 “may interact with the anticoagulant (blood thinner) warfarin and the diabetes drug insulin”. CoQ10 is sixth of six on this label, inside a 7.5 mg remainder, so the ceiling is about 1.5 mg — a ceiling, not an amount. At that size this is context rather than an alarm, and it is printed here for one reason: the word warfarin appears nowhere on this product, and the person who should be weighing it is whoever manages your anticoagulation, not you and not this desk.
Anyone already taking magnesium
The NIH Office of Dietary Supplements sets the Tolerable Upper Intake Level for supplemental magnesium at 350 mg a day for adults, and records that high doses from supplements or medications “often result in diarrhea”. One capsule here is 80 mg, about 23% of that figure, which is a sensible place for a magnesium capsule to sit and is recorded on this site as a point in the product’s favour. The arithmetic that matters is additive: a second magnesium supplement, a multivitamin containing magnesium, or a magnesium-containing antacid or laxative all count towards the same total.
The magnesium figure against the two numbers the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements publishes: a Daily Value of 420 mg, and a Tolerable Upper Intake Level of 350 mg for magnesium taken as a supplement. At 80 mg a capsule this product is at about 23% of that upper limit, which is a point in its favour.
Anyone the label already excludes, and anyone on any prescription
The caution block excludes under-eighteens and pregnant or nursing mothers outright, and NCCIH separately records that turmeric use during pregnancy “may be unsafe”. Beyond those, the label’s final sentence covers everyone else who should ask first: anyone taking a medication of any kind, and anyone with a medical condition. The NIH Office of Dietary Supplements also records a seizure-risk note for people with seizure disorders in relation to carnitine. Take the panel to the appointment rather than the product name; a prescriber can read a panel.
Before the first capsule
Eight things to do with the bottle in your hand, in order. None of them is advice about whether to take it; all of them are things a buyer can do that nobody else will do for them.
- 01Read the Supplement Facts panel, not the graphicThe ruled box is the declaration. On this bottle it says Magnesium 80 mg, 19% above a 575 mg Proprietary Blend of six named ingredients. If the thing that persuaded you to buy was a sentence on a graphic rather than a row in that box, read the box first.
- 02Read the caution block, all of itIt is four sentences and it is the only part of the label addressed to your body. It names a dose limit, excludes under-eighteens and pregnant or nursing mothers, and tells anyone on a medication or with a medical condition to consult a physician first. This label’s block is more complete than most; read it as an instruction rather than as boilerplate.
- 03Add the 80 mg to whatever magnesium you already takeThe NIH Office of Dietary Supplements sets the Tolerable Upper Intake Level for supplemental magnesium at 350 mg a day for adults and records that high doses “often result in diarrhea”. One capsule here is 80 mg, about 23% of that. If you already take a magnesium supplement, a multivitamin containing magnesium or a magnesium-containing laxative or antacid, these add up and the total is the number that matters.
- 04If you take a prescription medicine, show the bottle to whoever prescribed itTake the actual panel, not the product name. The one documented interaction among these six ingredients is coenzyme Q10, which NCCIH records “may interact with the anticoagulant (blood thinner) warfarin and the diabetes drug insulin”. At a ceiling near 1.5 mg — a ceiling, not an amount — that is context rather than an alarm, and your prescriber is the person who should hold the full list rather than you.
- 05If the nerve symptoms have not been explained, get them explainedThis is the step that matters most and it is not about this product. Numbness, tingling, burning or weakness have many causes. Some are reversible if addressed and some are not, and a supplement label cannot tell you which you have. Buying a bottle instead of getting an explanation substitutes a purchase for a diagnosis.
- 06Check the seal and the lot before the first capsuleThe label says in terms not to use the product if the safety seal is damaged or missing. Read the lot and best-before codes on the base of the bottle and photograph them. The codes printed on this site are draft reference strings this desk composed for asking the order desk a question; yours are the real ones and they are the only ones a laboratory could match.
- 07Photograph the checkout screen before you payNo price is published in any document supplied to this desk, and no guarantee length either. The checkout is the only place either exists, and it is the only record you will have of what you agreed to. Photograph it, keep the order email and write the date down.
- 08Write down what you expect to notice, and whenNot as a promise but as a check on yourself. This product makes structure/function claims only, no route of action is stated in any document supplied, and five of its six ingredients sit inside a 7.5 mg remainder. Deciding in advance what would count as a change, and by when, is the cheapest protection a buyer has against their own hopefulness.
Step five is the one this desk would keep if it could keep only one. The other seven are good habits with a label. That one is about what the product is for.
If you have a reaction
If something happens after you take this product, the first call is to a clinician — and if it is severe, to emergency care rather than to anybody listed on a bottle or a website.
No reporting body or address is published here, and this is why
A page like this one would normally name a national adverse-event reporting scheme and link to it. None of the nine documents cited on this site carries such a scheme, an address or a web address for one, and this desk does not invent a route it has not read. So none is named here. What exists is concrete and is on your bottle: the telephone number and email printed on the label, and the order desk supplied with the product. Call your prescriber or your clinician first, then the number on the bottle, and keep a written record of both.
| Route | Where it comes from | What it is for |
|---|---|---|
| Your own clinician or prescriber | Not on the bottle, and the most important route on this page | Anything that is happening to your body. This is the first call, every time. |
| Emergency care | Not on the bottle | Anything severe or fast. Do not route a severe reaction through a customer-service line. |
| +1 (323) 403-4725 | Printed on the label itself | The responsible company’s own published number. Ask for the lot to be recorded against your report. |
| [email protected] | Printed on the label itself | A written record, which a telephone call does not give you. Send the lot code and the date. |
| +1 (302) 200-3480 | The order desk, from the material supplied | Help with placed orders, refunds and cancellations. It is a different number from the one on the label, and this desk has recorded that mismatch rather than reconciled it. |
| A national reporting scheme | Not published in anything supplied to this desk | Nothing can be given here. No scheme, address or web address appears in any of the nine documents cited on this site, so none is printed. |
Two practical notes. Write down the lot code from your own bottle before you call, because a report without a lot cannot be matched to a production run; the lot and certificate strings published on this site are draft reference strings this desk composed and are not yours. And keep whatever you are told in writing, because the three contact routes published for this product do not agree with one another — all of them are printed on the contact page with the mismatch left visible.
The reviewer slot is vacant
Every page on this site carries a byline position for a medical reviewer, and on every page it is an empty bracket rather than a name.
Why there is no name in it
This page has not yet been reviewed by a named clinician. The slot above is deliberately left vacant rather than filled with a name this desk cannot stand behind. The seller pack supplied a real podiatrist’s name to print here; nothing supplied shows that he read these pages, so his name is not used. When a named reviewer has read them, the name, credential and date will appear in that slot on every page.
The alternative was available and was declined. A clinician’s name arrived in the material supplied to this desk for exactly this purpose. Printing it would have produced a page that looked medically reviewed without being medically reviewed, which is the single most misleading thing a site like this one can do — and it would be most misleading on precisely this page, where a reader is weighing a symptom against a bottle.
The bracket stays empty until somebody has actually read these pages. When one has, the name, the credential and the date will appear in that slot on every page at once, and nothing else about the site will change. The reasoning, and what the slot will say when it is filled, is set out on the about page.
Until then the position is stated plainly: these pages were written by The Neuralisse Editorial Desk, whose work is label analysis and fact-checking, and they have not been reviewed by a named clinician. That is a weaker claim than most supplement sites make and it is the accurate one.
References
Nine sources, all opened and read. Every quotation on this page is copied from the page linked here, and none of the nine carries an adverse-event reporting route, which is why none is named in the section above.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2026). Dietary Supplement Labeling Guide: Chapter IV. Nutrition Labeling.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2026). Structure/Function Claims.
- NIH Office of Dietary Supplements (2026). Magnesium: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals.
- NIH Office of Dietary Supplements (2026). Magnesium: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals — nerve function.
- NIH Office of Dietary Supplements (2023). Carnitine: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals.
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (2025). Turmeric: Usefulness and Safety.
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (2019). Coenzyme Q10.
- Operation Supplement Safety, U.S. Department of Defense (2026). Proprietary blends: What does this mean?.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2026). Questions and Answers on Dietary Supplements.
The companion pages carry the rest of the position. The terms page sets out what this site is and the rule that a ceiling is never an amount. The privacy notice sets out what is collected, which is close to nothing. And the safety page works through what the label warns about and what it leaves out, ingredient by ingredient.
Read the blend row before you decide
Thirty capsules, one a day. The panel declares 80 mg of magnesium at 19% of the Daily Value, and a 575 mg blend of six ingredients. The magnesium declaration fixes the weight of the first ingredient at about 567.5 mg, which leaves roughly 7.5 mg for the other five together. No price appears anywhere but the checkout.
- Guarantee as printed at checkout
- 80 mg magnesium, 19% of the Daily Value
- Returns to 4 Times Square, Floor 22, New York, NY 10036, USA
No price appears in any document supplied to this desk, as of October 11, 2026, so none is printed here. The checkout screen is the only place a price exists. Questions first? Every published contact route is here.
Keep reading
Authorship and review
Who wrote and checked this page
What this page was checked against
- The label artwork, read at 2× and transcribed character for character. Where the label and the marketing disagree, the label is printed.
- The seller pack, quoted rather than paraphrased, and identified as marketing wherever it is used.
- The published sources listed in the references on this page. Every one was opened and read; none is cited from memory.
- The arithmetic, shown in full. Every per-ingredient figure other than the magnesium is a ceiling derived from one printed number, never a measured amount.
- Nothing else. Any fact that was not supplied is recorded as not published rather than filled in.
Last updated October 11, 2026. A highlighted slot is a value no human has supplied yet. Who reviews these pages?